<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STALKING THE RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS, by Dan Rockmore (Vintage, $14.95; release date May, 2006)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dibsblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=16" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dibsblog.com/?p=16</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dibs! &#187; Mathematical Community Greets Earth-Shattering Claims With Silence</title>
		<link>http://www.dibsblog.com/?p=16#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dibs! &#187; Mathematical Community Greets Earth-Shattering Claims With Silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dibsblog.com/?p=16#comment-935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In response to one of the very earliest Dibs! posts &#8212; a review of Dan Rockmore&#8217;s Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis &#8212; Dibs! has recently received an astonishing email from Jiang Chun-Xuan, a mathematician in China who claims to have disproved the legendarily difficult problem. Chun-Xuan included in his email a detailed mathematical paper (which you can view online in pdf form here) which purports to conclusively demonstrate that Riemann&#8217;s hypothesis is in fact false. Why did Chun-Xuan bother to notify a lowly literary blog of his epochal discovery? Therein lies a tale &#8212; and here the story starts to get even more mystifying. (If you&#8217;re wondering what the Reimann Hypothesis even is, click on the review of the Rockmore book above for an explanation.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In response to one of the very earliest Dibs! posts &#8212; a review of Dan Rockmore&#8217;s Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis &#8212; Dibs! has recently received an astonishing email from Jiang Chun-Xuan, a mathematician in China who claims to have disproved the legendarily difficult problem. Chun-Xuan included in his email a detailed mathematical paper (which you can view online in pdf form here) which purports to conclusively demonstrate that Riemann&#8217;s hypothesis is in fact false. Why did Chun-Xuan bother to notify a lowly literary blog of his epochal discovery? Therein lies a tale &#8212; and here the story starts to get even more mystifying. (If you&#8217;re wondering what the Reimann Hypothesis even is, click on the review of the Rockmore book above for an explanation.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
